The humanities and social sciences hold a pivotal role in higher education, yet a unified evaluation framework for assessing scientific research performance in these fields remains elusive. Researchers have identified issues within the existing evaluation mechanisms, necessitating the development of a scientific evaluation system and compatible standards tailored to humanities and social sciences professionals.

The primary goal of scientific research performance evaluation is to pinpoint deficiencies in research endeavors, fostering continuous enhancement of scientific research capabilities. Evaluation in humanities and social sciences is particularly critical, serving as a cornerstone for appraising achievements and galvanizing the enthusiasm and creativity of researchers in these domains. Furthermore, the efficacy of the evaluation mechanism directly influences scientific research management, further underscoring its significance.

To propel the evolution of research performance evaluation in humanities and social sciences, this study undertook a comprehensive exploration of the current evaluation framework. By analyzing existing challenges, the study has identified solutions to refine and improve the research evaluation mechanism, ultimately advancing the quality and impact of scientific research in these vital fields.